Livestock Forage Disaster Program in New Mexico, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,816
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in New Mexico totaled $17,916,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mescalero Apache Tribe | Mescalero, NM 88340 | $273,564 |
| 2 | U Bar Ranch | Gila, NM 88038 | $145,631 |
| 3 | Cox Land & Cattle Co LLC | Carlsbad, NM 88220 | $119,954 |
| 4 | F & F Cattle Company | Mosquero, NM 87733 | $119,257 |
| 5 | Poverty Flats Land & Cattle Inc | Carrizozo, NM 88301 | $118,503 |
| 6 | Hurt Cattle Co Inc | Deming, NM 88031 | $117,875 |
| 7 | Ramos Land & Cattle Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $117,875 |
| 8 | Taylor Ranch | Roswell, NM 88202 | $117,625 |
| 9 | C S Cattle Co Inc | Cimarron, NM 87714 | $112,834 |
| 10 | Alamo Ranch Company | Deming, NM 88031 | $109,365 |
| 11 | Tom Mc Cauley & Son Inc | Cliff, NM 88028 | $102,240 |
| 12 | Irene Daniels | Wagon Mound, NM 87752 | $99,400 |
| 13 | 2c Ranch General Partnership | Tyrone, NM 88065 | $99,270 |
| 14 | Slash 46 Inc | Loving, NM 88256 | $97,079 |
| 15 | Jeff G Cornell | Wagon Mound, NM 87752 | $93,410 |
| 16 | L T Cattle Co LLC | Silver City, NM 88062 | $91,829 |
| 17 | Running N Cattle Co | Elida, NM 88116 | $90,991 |
| 18 | Cornerstone Ranch Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $88,750 |
| 19 | Johnson Ranches LLC | Columbus, NM 88029 | $88,358 |
| 20 | Eugene Johnson & Son's Ranch | Cuba, NM 87013 | $87,690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf