Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Chaves County, New Mexico, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 97
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Chaves County, New Mexico totaled $1,838,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poverty Flats Land & Cattle Inc | Carrizozo, NM 88301 | $118,503 |
| 2 | Ramos Land & Cattle Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $117,875 |
| 3 | Taylor Ranch | Roswell, NM 88202 | $117,625 |
| 4 | Russell Leonard | Hope, NM 88250 | $72,701 |
| 5 | Casabonne Family Limited Partners | Hope, NM 88250 | $57,078 |
| 6 | Joe Brad Morris | Lake Arthur, NM 88253 | $40,764 |
| 7 | A D Jones Estate Inc | Roswell, NM 88202 | $37,391 |
| 8 | Dtmc Ltd | Roswell, NM 88202 | $36,230 |
| 9 | Michael J Bennett | Hope, NM 88250 | $36,073 |
| 10 | Ladyhawk Agua Negra LLC | Santa Rosa, NM 88435 | $35,811 |
| 11 | Barnard Ranch LLC | Elida, NM 88116 | $35,601 |
| 12 | Jerry D Rose | Carlsbad, NM 88220 | $35,212 |
| 13 | Cecil B Riley | Roswell, NM 88201 | $32,926 |
| 14 | Gents Cattle Co Inc | Roswell, NM 88203 | $32,514 |
| 15 | Penasco River Ranch LLC | Roswell, NM 88202 | $32,083 |
| 16 | Charles Ferguson | Roswell, NM 88201 | $29,356 |
| 17 | Mathis Land And Cattle Inc | Elida, NM 88116 | $27,138 |
| 18 | J Y Ranch Inc | Dexter, NM 88230 | $27,097 |
| 19 | Steven E Herwig | Hobbs, NM 88240 | $26,909 |
| 20 | Glen Hisel | Clovis, NM 88101 | $26,621 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf