Non-insured Disaster Assistance in DeBaca County, New Mexico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 56
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in DeBaca County, New Mexico totaled $1,552,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leigh Murphy | Yeso, NM 88136 | $113,380 |
| 2 | 3 Slash Land & Cattle LLC | Taiban, NM 88134 | $93,930 |
| 3 | 4mcc Cattle Co LLC | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $88,016 |
| 4 | Steele Ranch Incorporated | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $81,055 |
| 5 | Cornerstone Ranch Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $77,060 |
| 6 | El Yeso Ranch Company | Yeso, NM 88136 | $65,839 |
| 7 | Mccollum Cattle Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $60,867 |
| 8 | J & W Cattle Co | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $53,330 |
| 9 | Canyon Blanco Ranch Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $53,005 |
| 10 | James C Koontz | Corrales, NM 87048 | $49,912 |
| 11 | Means Rio Pecos Ranch LLC | Van Horn, TX 79855 | $46,882 |
| 12 | 4-d Cattle Company Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $44,355 |
| 13 | Scott Lewis | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $39,891 |
| 14 | Powhatan Carter III | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $39,062 |
| 15 | Jimmy Ward | Elida, NM 88116 | $36,351 |
| 16 | Achen Ranch LLC | Yeso, NM 88136 | $35,510 |
| 17 | Ramon Perez Ranch Inc | Vaughn, NM 88353 | $35,257 |
| 18 | Cortese Farm & Ranch Inc | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $33,402 |
| 19 | Triangle Cattle Co | Rio Rancho, NM 87174 | $31,433 |
| 20 | Stanley T Dunbar | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $29,715 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf