Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 117
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Dona Ana County, New Mexico totaled $335,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steven Lyles Farms Inc | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $30,137 |
2 | Porter Farms LLC | Salem, NM 87941 | $25,064 |
3 | Deputy Farms Inc | El Paso, TX 79932 | $20,405 |
4 | Willie Hernandez | Anthony, NM 88021 | $19,008 |
5 | Sloan & Sloan Inc | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $13,379 |
6 | Ludwig Farms | Anthony, NM 88021 | $12,560 |
7 | John W Tharp Jr | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $12,467 |
8 | Robert M Sloan | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $11,934 |
9 | Rmb Ventures LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $10,412 |
10 | Danny-joe Farms LLC | Mesilla Park, NM 88047 | $9,533 |
11 | Dominguez Farms Inc | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $8,955 |
12 | Franco Farms | Vado, NM 88072 | $8,549 |
13 | Andrew L Jacques | Anthony, NM 88021 | $7,494 |
14 | Charles Tharp Farms LLC | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $6,682 |
15 | Joe Nelson Inc | Anthony, NM 88021 | $6,387 |
16 | Rodney And Mary Lou Tharp | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $6,063 |
17 | Deruyter Family Management Trust | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $6,012 |
18 | Chile River Inc | Salem, NM 87941 | $5,887 |
19 | Ramon G Alvarez | Anthony, NM 88021 | $5,756 |
20 | Rjf Farms Inc | Hatch, NM 87937 | $5,427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>