Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Quay County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 42
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Quay County, New Mexico totaled $144,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Albert Chacon | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $13,783 |
2 | Adolph And Helen Miera Family Tru | Nara Visa, NM 88430 | $9,422 |
3 | A Henry Bugg | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $6,538 |
4 | Jim Paris | Bard, NM 88411 | $6,184 |
5 | Albert Pacheco | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $5,982 |
6 | Don Curnutt | Orofino, ID 83544 | $5,921 |
7 | Bugg Family Rev Trust | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $4,093 |
8 | Paul C Quintana | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $3,512 |
9 | Johnny Irving | Logan, NM 88426 | $3,500 |
10 | Homer Farrow | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $3,500 |
11 | Robert E Curtis | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $3,500 |
12 | Jack Gilmore | Conchas Dam, NM 88416 | $3,500 |
13 | Lucille Hancock | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $3,500 |
14 | A W Hancock | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $3,500 |
15 | Kenny R Terry | Bushland, TX 79012 | $3,500 |
16 | Mark W Mccasland | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $3,500 |
17 | Paul Estrada | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $3,500 |
18 | Tommy Evans | San Jon, NM 88434 | $3,500 |
19 | Robert Abercrombie | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $3,500 |
20 | George Aragon Jr | Albuquerque, NM 87123 | $3,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>