Farm Subsidy information
Taos County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Taos County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 528
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Taos County, New Mexico totaled $6,425,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Danny R Gonzales | Penasco, NM 87553 | $13,784 |
102 | Billy E Vigil | Costilla, NM 87524 | $13,691 |
103 | Geralyn Marquez | Arroyo Seco, NM 87514 | $13,428 |
104 | Valdamar Deherrera Jr | Costilla, NM 87524 | $13,423 |
105 | Jose D Mondragon | Ranchos De Taos, NM 87557 | $13,147 |
106 | Dba Johnny And Max Mascarenas | Questa, NM 87556 | $13,095 |
107 | Emilio J Martinez | Taos, NM 87571 | $13,089 |
108 | Timothy Sanchez | Vadito, NM 87579 | $12,721 |
109 | Susan Garcia | Ranchos De Taos, NM 87557 | $12,412 |
110 | Edward J Martinez | Ranchos De Taos, NM 87557 | $12,334 |
111 | Martin P Torres | Taos, NM 87571 | $11,927 |
112 | Jimmy Romero | Albuquerque, NM 87121 | $11,734 |
113 | Johnny Mascarenas | Questa, NM 87556 | $11,692 |
114 | Frank J Quintana | Cerro, NM 87519 | $11,609 |
115 | Porfirio Cisneros | Questa, NM 87556 | $11,396 |
116 | Ambrose Mascarenas | Llano, NM 87543 | $11,256 |
117 | Lilly J Vigil | Taos, NM 87571 | $11,130 |
118 | Leo M Mondragon | Penasco, NM 87553 | $11,122 |
119 | Herbert Martinez | Arroyo Seco, NM 87514 | $10,947 |
120 | Virgil Martinez | Cerro, NM 87519 | $10,690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”