Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Union County, New Mexico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 169
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Union County, New Mexico totaled $1,158,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kay Arnett | Clayton, NM 88415 | $5,668 |
62 | Gary Wright | Clayton, NM 88415 | $5,662 |
63 | Kenneth E Dellinger | Clayton, NM 88415 | $5,350 |
64 | Daniel Ryan Doherty | Folsom, NM 88419 | $5,281 |
65 | Larry Mason | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $5,280 |
66 | Ruth Shields | Amistad, NM 88410 | $5,183 |
67 | Joe C Hutchison | Pampa, TX 79065 | $5,170 |
68 | Durrett Ranches | Amarillo, TX 79102 | $5,169 |
69 | H&s Cattle Company No 2 | Clayton, NM 88415 | $5,128 |
70 | Debbera J Wallace | Folsom, NM 88419 | $5,098 |
71 | Deeds Cattle Company LLC | Clayton, NM 88415 | $5,046 |
72 | Corby S Poling | Sedan, NM 88436 | $5,001 |
73 | Chad Crisp | Clayton, NM 88415 | $4,675 |
74 | His Blessings LLC | Wauchula, FL 33873 | $4,614 |
75 | Patrick J Riley | Clayton, NM 88415 | $4,600 |
76 | Jeanne Cope | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $4,387 |
77 | Jeff Harris | Clayton, NM 88415 | $4,337 |
78 | Consuelo Ann Sowers | Clayton, NM 88415 | $4,233 |
79 | Larry Fry | Clayton, NM 88415 | $4,163 |
80 | Doug Cowan | Grenville, NM 88424 | $4,131 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”