Farm Subsidy information
New York
Total Subsidies in New York, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,054
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New York totaled $116,304,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Satur Farms, LLC | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $1,183,965 |
2 | Crist Bros. Orchards, Inc. | Walden, NY 12586 | $900,000 |
3 | Brightly Farms, LLC | Hamlin, NY 14464 | $832,993 |
4 | Dembroski Orchards Inc | Plattekill, NY 12568 | $797,954 |
5 | Porpiglia Farms Inc | Marlboro, NY 12542 | $722,861 |
6 | Morgiewicz Produce, Inc. | Goshen, NY 10924 | $703,660 |
7 | Joseph Heberle Farms | Hamlin, NY 14464 | $662,307 |
8 | Root Brothers | Albion, NY 14411 | $576,334 |
9 | R & G Produce, LLC | Goshen, NY 10924 | $565,324 |
10 | Allstate Apple Exchange Inc | Milton, NY 12547 | $550,305 |
11 | Gallagher Farms LLC | Deansboro, NY 13328 | $503,088 |
12 | Pioneer King Produce Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $494,549 |
13 | Frankie's Produce Farms Inc | Florida, NY 10921 | $486,592 |
14 | Woodcrest Dairy LLC | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $471,348 |
15 | Sullivan Orchards Inc | Peru, NY 12972 | $448,486 |
16 | Alan D Tomion | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $434,479 |
17 | Jados Farms | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $430,301 |
18 | Marquart Bros., LLC | Gainesville, NY 14066 | $424,926 |
19 | M G Hurd & Sons Inc | Clintondale, NY 12515 | $406,790 |
20 | Torrey Farms Inc | Elba, NY 14058 | $394,425 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>