Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Cayuga County, New York, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 252
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Cayuga County, New York totaled $1,567,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sunnyside Farms Inc | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $123,795 |
| 2 | Oakwood Dairy LLC | Auburn, NY 13021 | $58,286 |
| 3 | Aurora Ridge Dairy LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $50,541 |
| 4 | Allen Farms LLC | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $50,312 |
| 5 | Cayuga Dairy LLC | Genoa, NY 13071 | $43,670 |
| 6 | Du Mond Ag LLC | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $43,291 |
| 7 | Ashland Farm LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $41,965 |
| 8 | Dugan Farms LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $40,316 |
| 9 | Spruce Haven Farm LLC | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $34,770 |
| 10 | Vansridge Dairy LLC | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $32,014 |
| 11 | Twin Birch Dairy LLC | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $30,762 |
| 12 | Thomas Roach | Venice Center, NY 13147 | $29,703 |
| 13 | Peters Dairy Farm Inc | Auburn, NY 13021 | $29,314 |
| 14 | Ridgecrest Dairy LLC | Genoa, NY 13071 | $27,070 |
| 15 | Slobe Farms LLC | Red Creek, NY 13143 | $26,915 |
| 16 | Scipio Springs Dairy | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $22,823 |
| 17 | Osterhoudt Farms LLC | Genoa, NY 13071 | $22,750 |
| 18 | Green Hill Dairy Inc | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $22,582 |
| 19 | James Sierzenga | Auburn, NY 13021 | $21,971 |
| 20 | Ww Patterson Inc | Auburn, NY 13021 | $19,317 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf