Direct Payment Program in Saratoga County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 180
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Saratoga County, New York totaled $3,014,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Westwind Ag, LLC | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $231,008 |
| 2 | Turning Point Dairy LLC | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $183,897 |
| 3 | Thomas A Gorsky Jr | Stillwater, NY 12170 | $157,550 |
| 4 | Hanehan Family Dairy - LLC | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $143,941 |
| 5 | Walter S Gifford III | Schaghticoke, NY 12154 | $138,100 |
| 6 | Thomas Poultry Farm Inc | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $128,982 |
| 7 | Welcome Stock Farm LLC | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $127,512 |
| 8 | David R Wood As Eildon Tweed Farm LLC | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $115,963 |
| 9 | Clear Echo Farm - LLC | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $114,402 |
| 10 | Saratoga Sod Farm Inc | Stillwater, NY 12170 | $85,965 |
| 11 | Barber Brothers | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $81,582 |
| 12 | Smith Brothers Farms | Ballston Spa, NY 12020 | $63,523 |
| 13 | Kings-ransom Farm LLC | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $54,162 |
| 14 | Bourret Farms Inc | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $51,434 |
| 15 | Sweeney Farms | Mechanicville, NY 12118 | $49,645 |
| 16 | Koval Brothers Dairy - LLC | Stillwater, NY 12170 | $43,496 |
| 17 | Sugar Hill Sugar View Farm Inc | Rexford, NY 12148 | $43,455 |
| 18 | Hall John & Gail | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $42,842 |
| 19 | Michael Mitchell | Schuylerville, NY 12871 | $39,729 |
| 20 | Killian Dairy Farm - LLC | Gansevoort, NY 12831 | $39,321 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf