Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Schuyler County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Schuyler County, New York totaled $75,190 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles Roth | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $16,913 |
| 2 | John A Arcangeli | Burdett, NY 14818 | $13,876 |
| 3 | Chester E Buckley | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $8,000 |
| 4 | Howard Gleason | Trumansburg, NY 14886 | $7,722 |
| 5 | Virginia Naylor | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $6,000 |
| 6 | Wonderview Farm | Horseheads, NY 14845 | $3,396 |
| 7 | Mark Harth | Burdett, NY 14818 | $2,987 |
| 8 | Edward Gates | Montour Falls, NY 14865 | $2,931 |
| 9 | Kenneth Jaynes | Beaver Dams, NY 14812 | $2,040 |
| 10 | Gary Gaige | Alpine, NY 14805 | $1,725 |
| 11 | John Rockwell | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $1,333 |
| 12 | Chateau Frank Inc | Hammondsport, NY 14840 | $1,277 |
| 13 | Burr Ayr Farms, Ltd. | Trumansburg, NY 14886 | $1,177 |
| 14 | Wesley Deceased Plate | Montour Falls, NY 14865 | $988 |
| 15 | Richard O Smith | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $970 |
| 16 | Edward Dykshoorn | Odessa, NY 14869 | $851 |
| 17 | Harry Bailey | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $801 |
| 18 | Thomas Peoples | Van Etten, NY 14889 | $767 |
| 19 | Sgrecci Farms | Elmira, NY 14901 | $724 |
| 20 | Keith Baker | Watkins Glen, NY 14891 | $407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf