Total Commodity Programs in Suffolk County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 120
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Suffolk County, New York totaled $6,796,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Thomas Tyrrell | Bayshore, NY 11706 | $1,882 |
102 | Founders Oyster Farm LLC | Southold, NY 11971 | $1,863 |
103 | Norman Stiansen Jr | Hampton Bays, NY 11946 | $1,801 |
104 | Conscience Point Shellfish Hatchery Corporation | Southampton, NY 11969 | $1,750 |
105 | Ed Zilnicki & Sons LLC | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $1,698 |
106 | Theodore Stevens | Montauk, NY 11954 | $1,297 |
107 | We Are The New Farmers Inc. | Brooklyn, NY 11220 | $1,187 |
108 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,040 |
109 | Marcos G Ribeiro Jr | Shirley, NY 11967 | $941 |
110 | Long Island Pelagics LLC | Hampton Bays, NY 11946 | $830 |
111 | Long Island Blue Point Oyster LLC | West Islip, NY 11795 | $818 |
112 | Tor Vincent | Northport, NY 11768 | $743 |
113 | David L Steele Farms LLC | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $506 |
114 | Bear's Fruit, LLC | Brooklyn, NY 11232 | $500 |
115 | Amame | New York, NY 10011 | $500 |
116 | Lexunder Inc | Brooklyn, NY 11235 | $500 |
117 | William C Reimer III | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $489 |
118 | Satur Farms, LLC | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $430 |
119 | Blue Fin Iv, Inc. | Montauk, NY 11954 | $354 |
120 | Pontos Fisheries Inc | Montauk, NY 11954 | $325 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous