Total Commodity Programs in Suffolk County, New York, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 120
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Suffolk County, New York totaled $6,796,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emma's Garden Growers, Inc. | Huntington, NY 11743 | $638,012 |
| 2 | Landscaping By Country Gardens Inc | Eastport, NY 11941 | $359,033 |
| 3 | Otto Keil Florists, Inc | Huntington, NY 11743 | $325,847 |
| 4 | Shade Trees Nursery Inc | Jamesport, NY 11947 | $267,881 |
| 5 | East Coast Nurseries Inc | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $250,000 |
| 6 | Gabrielsen Farms LLC | Jamesport, NY 11947 | $250,000 |
| 7 | Gabby G Fisheries Inc. | Montauk, NY 11954 | $250,000 |
| 8 | Beds & Borders Inc | Laurel, NY 11948 | $236,765 |
| 9 | Eastland Farms Inc. | Water Mill, NY 11976 | $224,483 |
| 10 | Juniper Hill Inc | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $207,078 |
| 11 | Helen's Greenhouses & Flower Farm, Inc. | Aquebogue, NY 11931 | $169,506 |
| 12 | Delea Leasing Corp D/b/a Delea Sod Farms | East Northport, NY 11731 | $166,675 |
| 13 | Charles Spitzner Nursery LLC | Manorville, NY 11949 | $157,827 |
| 14 | Harbes Family Of Farms LLC | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $150,481 |
| 15 | Sang Lee Farms Inc | Peconic, NY 11958 | $150,179 |
| 16 | Northeast Nurseries | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $140,195 |
| 17 | F/v Illusion Inc. | Greenport, NY 11944 | $131,091 |
| 18 | Greenlawn Sod Farms Inc | Wading River, NY 11792 | $120,620 |
| 19 | Albert And Dorothy Schmitt, LLC | Dix Hills, NY 11746 | $116,369 |
| 20 | Remi Wesnofske Inc | Bridgehampton, NY 11932 | $116,339 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf