Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Suffolk County, New York, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 131

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Suffolk County, New York totaled $11,046,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Norman Keil Nurseries Inc.St James, NY 11780$750,000
2H. F. Corwin & Son, Inc.Aquebogue, NY 11931$750,000
3Koppert Cress Usa LLC, Dba FlavouCutchogue, NY 11935$649,032
4Emma's Garden Growers, Inc.Huntington, NY 11743$638,012
5Kurt Weiss Greenhouses, IncCenter Moriches, NY 11934$500,000
6Landscaping By Country Gardens IncEastport, NY 11941$359,033
7Otto Keil Florists, IncHuntington, NY 11743$325,847
8Frank M. Flower & Sons, Inc.Oyster Bay, NY 11771$288,410
9Shade Trees Nursery IncJamesport, NY 11947$267,881
10East Coast Nurseries IncRiverhead, NY 11901$250,000
11Satur Farms, LLCCutchogue, NY 11935$250,000
12Van De Wetering Greenhouses, Inc.Jamesport, NY 11947$250,000
13Gabrielsen Farms LLCJamesport, NY 11947$250,000
14Beds & Borders IncLaurel, NY 11948$236,765
15Eastland Farms Inc.Water Mill, NY 11976$224,483
16Juniper Hill IncCutchogue, NY 11935$207,078
17Glover Perennials LLCCutchogue, NY 11935$190,715
18Helen's Greenhouses & Flower Farm, Inc.Aquebogue, NY 11931$169,506
19Delea Leasing Corp D/b/a Delea Sod FarmsEast Northport, NY 11731$166,675
20Bianchi-davis Greenhouses, Inc.Riverhead, NY 11901$166,338

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag