Farm Subsidy information
Suffolk County, New York
Total Subsidies in Suffolk County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 309
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Suffolk County, New York totaled $22,690,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Beds & Borders Inc | Laurel, NY 11948 | $242,867 |
| 22 | Great Atlantic Shellfish Farms Ll | West Islip, NY 11795 | $232,625 |
| 23 | Eastland Farms Inc. | Water Mill, NY 11976 | $224,483 |
| 24 | Bianchi-davis Greenhouses, Inc. | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $223,181 |
| 25 | Walter J Zilnicki Inc | Riverhead, NY 11901 | $210,549 |
| 26 | Juniper Hill Inc | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $207,078 |
| 27 | Paumanok Vineyards Ltd | Aquebogue, NY 11931 | $197,132 |
| 28 | Glover Perennials LLC | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $194,311 |
| 29 | Helen's Greenhouses & Flower Farm, Inc. | Aquebogue, NY 11931 | $169,506 |
| 30 | Delea Leasing Corp D/b/a Delea Sod Farms | East Northport, NY 11731 | $166,675 |
| 31 | Charles Spitzner Nursery LLC | Manorville, NY 11949 | $157,827 |
| 32 | American Seafood Inc. | Eastport, NY 11941 | $155,627 |
| 33 | Northeast Nurseries | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $152,634 |
| 34 | Harbes Family Of Farms LLC | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $150,481 |
| 35 | Sang Lee Farms Inc | Peconic, NY 11958 | $150,384 |
| 36 | Long Island Blue Point Oyster LLC | West Islip, NY 11795 | $148,885 |
| 37 | Borella Nursery, Inc. | Nesconset, NY 11767 | $145,302 |
| 38 | Craft Master Hops LLC | Remsenburg, NY 11960 | $139,688 |
| 39 | F/v Illusion Inc. | Greenport, NY 11944 | $131,091 |
| 40 | Greenlawn Sod Farms Inc | Wading River, NY 11792 | $120,620 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf