Farm Subsidy information
Suffolk County, New York
Total Subsidies in Suffolk County, New York, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 39
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Suffolk County, New York totaled $2,137,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Satur Farms, LLC | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $345,030 |
2 | Dune Fishery LLC | Patchogue, NY 11772 | $341,998 |
3 | Little A's Oysters LLC | Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 | $338,907 |
4 | , | $270,561 | |
5 | Hound's Tree Estate, LLC | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $206,208 |
6 | Greenport Oyster Company | Greenport, NY 11944 | $129,051 |
7 | Outstanding Firefighting Equipmen | Bayshore, NY 11706 | $96,760 |
8 | , | $48,441 | |
9 | Conway Marine LLC D/b/a Great South Bay Oyster Far | Oak Beach, NY 11702 | $46,659 |
10 | Susan Wicks | Mastic Beach, NY 11951 | $41,988 |
11 | , | $39,919 | |
12 | Fire Island Oyster Company LLC | Great River, NY 11739 | $37,884 |
13 | Lucky 13 Oysters, LLC | Brightwaters, NY 11718 | $12,032 |
14 | , | $11,875 | |
15 | The Yard Inc. | Center Moriches, NY 11934 | $11,769 |
16 | Remi Wesnofske Inc | Bridgehampton, NY 11932 | $8,882 |
17 | Aeros Cultured Oyster Company Inc | Southold, NY 11971 | $5,795 |
18 | Peconic Gold Oysters Inc. | Patchogue, NY 11772 | $4,948 |
19 | Invincible Summer Farms, LLC | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $4,570 |
20 | David L Steele Farms LLC | Mattituck, NY 11952 | $3,952 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>