Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Beaufort County, North Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 184
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Beaufort County, North Carolina totaled $2,228,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 B Farms Partnership | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $151,077 |
2 | Howell Farms | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $107,708 |
3 | Southland Farms | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $78,851 |
4 | Tetterton Family Farms Derick Tetterton Gen Ptr | Pantego, NC 27860 | $60,008 |
5 | Foxfire Farms Inc | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $56,765 |
6 | Nbe Farms Inc | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $56,765 |
7 | Beech Ridge Pork Farm Inc | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $52,350 |
8 | Hyde Park Farms LLC | Pantego, NC 27860 | $45,441 |
9 | Harold & Susan Smith Partnership | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $43,474 |
10 | Tankard Farm LLC | Bath, NC 27808 | $39,548 |
11 | L H Allen & Son Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $37,090 |
12 | Bishop Farming Enterprises Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $36,714 |
13 | W Haden Harris Farms Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $34,795 |
14 | Sid Cayton Farms LLC | Aurora, NC 27806 | $34,250 |
15 | Cutler Farms | Pantego, NC 27860 | $33,544 |
16 | Granny Branch Farms Inc | Aurora, NC 27806 | $33,075 |
17 | Arnold Farms Inc | Washington, NC 27889 | $32,578 |
18 | Fletcher Brothers | Pantego, NC 27860 | $32,042 |
19 | Joseph Brent Pilgreen | Bath, NC 27808 | $31,662 |
20 | Grissom Farms Inc | Washington, NC 27889 | $30,934 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>