Emergency Conservation Program in Craven County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Craven County, North Carolina totaled $1,206,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | French Farms | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $55,987 |
2 | T R C Farms Inc | Cove City, NC 28523 | $51,703 |
3 | Anderson Farms Jackie L Anderson Sr Della B Anders | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $50,077 |
4 | Billy Haddock & Son Farms | Grimesland, NC 27837 | $36,842 |
5 | Benjamin Derek Potter | Grantsboro, NC 28529 | $36,609 |
6 | Nadine Bland Rhodes | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $34,413 |
7 | Tom Nobles | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $32,059 |
8 | Thomas Dale Eborn | New Bern, NC 28560 | $31,876 |
9 | Bradley H Odum | Hubert, NC 28539 | $29,939 |
10 | Charles Clayton Mitchell | Cove City, NC 28523 | $29,298 |
11 | Brian A Higgins | Pollocksville, NC 28573 | $28,858 |
12 | Kimberly Potter | Grantsboro, NC 28529 | $26,829 |
13 | Shelby Farms LLC | Cove City, NC 28523 | $24,432 |
14 | Dale Owens Dawson | Cove City, NC 28523 | $20,141 |
15 | Glen Allen Ipock | New Bern, NC 28562 | $19,786 |
16 | Kenneth Quinn | Cove City, NC 28523 | $19,576 |
17 | Thomas A Eborn Jr | New Bern, NC 28560 | $19,368 |
18 | Fulcher Brothers Farm | Ernul, NC 28527 | $18,984 |
19 | Spring Branch Farms | New Bern, NC 28562 | $18,367 |
20 | Thomas Earl Cowan | Ernul, NC 28527 | $17,417 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>