Total Commodity Programs in Craven County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 126
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Craven County, North Carolina totaled $4,216,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | French Farms | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $388,903 |
2 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $384,045 |
3 | Anderson Farms Jackie L Anderson Sr Della B Anders | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $311,719 |
4 | R & W Mccoy Farms Inc | Cove City, NC 28523 | $179,410 |
5 | William E Sutton Jr | Ernul, NC 28527 | $175,260 |
6 | Fulcher Brothers Farm | Ernul, NC 28527 | $166,875 |
7 | David H Parker Farms Inc | New Bern, NC 28562 | $157,046 |
8 | Jason R Jones | Cove City, NC 28523 | $151,148 |
9 | Wood Brothers Farm Inc | Cove City, NC 28523 | $150,301 |
10 | J-1 Enterprises Inc | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $119,407 |
11 | Arthur Farms Inc | New Bern, NC 28562 | $116,566 |
12 | Charles Clayton Mitchell | Cove City, NC 28523 | $105,358 |
13 | Charles Allen Mitchell | Cove City, NC 28523 | $92,963 |
14 | Glen E Nobles | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $76,764 |
15 | H D & L Enterprises Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $75,167 |
16 | Carolina Ag LLC | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $72,702 |
17 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $72,320 |
18 | Thomas Dale Eborn | New Bern, NC 28560 | $66,730 |
19 | Michael Ray Roach | Grifton, NC 28530 | $65,566 |
20 | Robert Cowan | Ernul, NC 28527 | $64,212 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>