Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Durham County, North Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Durham County, North Carolina totaled $322,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sarah & Michael's Farm LLC | Durham, NC 27712 | $93,448 |
2 | Kiefer Landscaping Inc | Durham, NC 27713 | $53,852 |
3 | Phillip L Ellis | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $26,762 |
4 | James Ellis | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $26,749 |
5 | South Wind Produce LLC | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $23,929 |
6 | H David Harris | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $16,832 |
7 | James D Page | Raleigh, NC 27617 | $15,037 |
8 | David Robert Henderson | Durham, NC 27705 | $11,387 |
9 | Mark W Waller | Durham, NC 27705 | $8,528 |
10 | Pura Vida Farms, LLC | Bahama, NC 27503 | $4,824 |
11 | J Thomas Smith | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $4,180 |
12 | Stirrup Farm | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $3,368 |
13 | Wade Ellis | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $3,247 |
14 | Carolina Farmhouse Dairy LLC | Bahama, NC 27503 | $2,972 |
15 | Sandra Vergara | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $2,593 |
16 | John Benny Andrews | Durham, NC 27712 | $2,585 |
17 | William H Sparrow Jr | Durham, NC 27704 | $2,376 |
18 | Carolyn Michelle Rose-seed | Durham, NC 27703 | $2,303 |
19 | Neil Frank | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $2,255 |
20 | Barbara V Rhew | Durham, NC 27704 | $1,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>