Conservation Reserve Program in Franklin County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 90
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Franklin County, North Carolina totaled $93,783 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Harold And Matt Reddick LLC | Durham, NC 27703 | $9,936 |
2 | L H Dickens Farms LLC | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $5,770 |
3 | Alice P Hunter | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $5,445 |
4 | Jarrett W Southall | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $2,701 |
5 | C & R Family Properties LLC | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $2,530 |
6 | Gary Fuller | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $2,506 |
7 | Cade Carter | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $2,494 |
8 | Wallace A Pruitt Jr | Franklinton, NC 27525 | $2,485 |
9 | Carolyn Aycock | Wake Forest, NC 27587 | $2,381 |
10 | Thompson Properties | Franklinton, NC 27525 | $2,276 |
11 | James H Wheless | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $2,177 |
12 | Frances S Tharrington | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $2,088 |
13 | Sandra W Bailey | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $1,992 |
14 | Dorsett/boyle Family LLC | Chapel Hill, NC 27517 | $1,914 |
15 | Jack And Shirley Green LLC | Savannah, GA 31406 | $1,896 |
16 | Bennie Ray Gupton | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $1,892 |
17 | Nell Rose Holmes LLC | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $1,824 |
18 | Jack E Norwood | Raleigh, NC 27609 | $1,707 |
19 | Joyce B Dickens | Rocky Mount, NC 27804 | $1,652 |
20 | Louis Southall | Louisburg, NC 27549 | $1,470 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>