Farm Subsidy information
Halifax County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Halifax County, North Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 243
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Halifax County, North Carolina totaled $11,541,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $315,387 |
2 | Michael Morris | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $201,230 |
3 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $188,560 |
4 | Pike Family Farms Partnership | Littleton, NC 27850 | $160,336 |
5 | A N Dickens Jr | Halifax, NC 27839 | $157,087 |
6 | Inscoe Family Farms LLC | Littleton, NC 27850 | $146,089 |
7 | Garner Family Farms | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $137,000 |
8 | Grant Staton Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $133,214 |
9 | Kl&z Farms LLC | Littleton, NC 27850 | $129,495 |
10 | James Inscoe | Littleton, NC 27850 | $96,839 |
11 | Chris A Braddy Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $91,342 |
12 | Jacob L Dickens III | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $90,483 |
13 | Ashley P Mohorn | Littleton, NC 27850 | $87,249 |
14 | Frederick Dunn Jr | Enfield, NC 27823 | $81,836 |
15 | Buzzardtown Farms LLC | Halifax, NC 27839 | $80,877 |
16 | Hedgepeth Farms | Halifax, NC 27839 | $74,135 |
17 | James M Hale | Halifax, NC 27839 | $73,084 |
18 | Morell Jones Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $71,930 |
19 | Warren Farms | Littleton, NC 27850 | $61,747 |
20 | Melvin Hale | Halifax, NC 27839 | $59,625 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>