Total Commodity Programs in Halifax County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 181
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Halifax County, North Carolina totaled $7,398,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $708,200 |
| 2 | Pike Family Farms Partnership | Littleton, NC 27850 | $257,152 |
| 3 | Jrk Farms LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $252,028 |
| 4 | Garner Family Farms | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $239,885 |
| 5 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $205,043 |
| 6 | Buckhorn Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $198,901 |
| 7 | Josey Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $179,130 |
| 8 | Kl&z Farms LLC | Littleton, NC 27850 | $178,483 |
| 9 | Morell Jones Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $176,571 |
| 10 | Inscoe Family Farms LLC | Littleton, NC 27850 | $166,291 |
| 11 | Hedgepeth Farms | Halifax, NC 27839 | $154,211 |
| 12 | James Inscoe | Littleton, NC 27850 | $150,623 |
| 13 | Fleming Brothers Farms LLC | Halifax, NC 27839 | $145,152 |
| 14 | Troy M Fulkerson | Enfield, NC 27823 | $140,303 |
| 15 | Fields Of Cotton LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $131,137 |
| 16 | A N Dickens Jr | Halifax, NC 27839 | $131,031 |
| 17 | Charles D Hale | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $130,887 |
| 18 | Robert C Cooke | Littleton, NC 27850 | $124,242 |
| 19 | Michael Morris | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $124,208 |
| 20 | Grant Staton Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $123,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf