Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Lincoln County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Lincoln County, North Carolina totaled $631,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Piedmont Turf Farm Inc | Maiden, NC 28650 | $119,531 |
2 | Clay David Heafner | Crouse, NC 28033 | $72,664 |
3 | David Mccart | Maiden, NC 28650 | $43,499 |
4 | M & M Produce Inc | Vale, NC 28168 | $32,545 |
5 | Beam Dairy LLC | Cherryville, NC 28021 | $31,811 |
6 | John N Leatherman | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $25,688 |
7 | Stephen B Secrest | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $24,727 |
8 | Jerry Wyant | Vale, NC 28168 | $23,183 |
9 | Calderon Produce Inc | Vale, NC 28168 | $21,503 |
10 | Gary D Davis | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $21,489 |
11 | Robert Thomas Wyant | Vale, NC 28168 | $19,632 |
12 | Calderon Peppers Inc | Vale, NC 28168 | $17,958 |
13 | Charles D Hamilton II | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $12,187 |
14 | Clayton Robert Tallent | Vale, NC 28168 | $11,533 |
15 | L J Seagle III | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $11,478 |
16 | Randy Leatherman | Vale, NC 28168 | $11,076 |
17 | Kevin E Lutz | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $9,968 |
18 | Gary Alan Davis | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $9,753 |
19 | Sheldon Miles Rudisill | Vale, NC 28168 | $8,796 |
20 | Joe Leonard Kiser | Vale, NC 28168 | $7,317 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>