Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Robeson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 265
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Robeson County, North Carolina totaled $978,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $65,189 |
2 | Buie Family Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $39,791 |
3 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $37,004 |
4 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $36,677 |
5 | Alfordsville Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $34,075 |
6 | Carmichael Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $33,740 |
7 | Raemon Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $32,604 |
8 | S & S Swine Mgt | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $27,869 |
9 | Mike Miller Farms LLC | Rowland, NC 28383 | $27,510 |
10 | Stonewall Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $25,280 |
11 | Kerry Bodenhamer Farms LLC | Maxton, NC 28364 | $24,747 |
12 | Elrod Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $23,720 |
13 | Lacy Ledford Cummings | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $23,314 |
14 | Henry D Locklear | Maxton, NC 28364 | $20,764 |
15 | Hagler Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $19,553 |
16 | Jonathan L Herndon | Parkton, NC 28371 | $16,455 |
17 | Baucom Family Farm General Partnership | Monroe, NC 28110 | $15,399 |
18 | Rowland Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $15,024 |
19 | Mary B Davis | Rowland, NC 28383 | $14,597 |
20 | Dale Samuel Gibson | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $14,367 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>