Total Commodity Programs in Robeson County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 586
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Robeson County, North Carolina totaled $5,622,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mr Jesse Chaying Yang | Maxton, NC 28364 | $250,000 |
| 2 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $194,834 |
| 3 | Nick Evans Farms | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $146,306 |
| 4 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $145,271 |
| 5 | Smith & Barkley Farms Inc | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $133,316 |
| 6 | Carmichael Farms LLC | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $131,878 |
| 7 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $131,718 |
| 8 | Mike Miller Farms LLC | Rowland, NC 28383 | $116,974 |
| 9 | Lacy Ledford Cummings | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $108,097 |
| 10 | Buie Family Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $100,766 |
| 11 | Jack Leggette Farms | Rowland, NC 28383 | $94,482 |
| 12 | Kerry Bodenhamer Farms LLC | Maxton, NC 28364 | $92,031 |
| 13 | Talley Farms Inc | Stanfield, NC 28163 | $91,012 |
| 14 | Herbert Colon Roberts III | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $87,343 |
| 15 | Roberts Farms | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $82,086 |
| 16 | P & S Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $68,876 |
| 17 | Rex A Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $68,224 |
| 18 | Rowland Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $67,310 |
| 19 | Elrod Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $65,483 |
| 20 | Jazac Farms LLC | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $63,965 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf