Total Conservation Programs in Sampson County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Sampson County, North Carolina totaled $49,175 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nida B Giddens | Faison, NC 28341 | $5,057 |
2 | Leon Michael Chesnutt | Rocky Mount, VA 24151 | $2,861 |
3 | The Harrell Family Farm LLC | Winston Salem, NC 27106 | $2,631 |
4 | Eric Fann | Benson, NC 27504 | $2,604 |
5 | Martha Bass Turner | Dunn, NC 28334 | $2,362 |
6 | Creekfield Farm LLC | Clinton, NC 28328 | $1,716 |
7 | Beulah P Newkirk Family Trust | Jacksonville, FL 32216 | $1,710 |
8 | Sammy W Giddens | Faison, NC 28341 | $1,554 |
9 | Leslie Mack Edwards | Clinton, NC 28328 | $1,485 |
10 | Jimmy Jordan | Smyrna, GA 30080 | $1,437 |
11 | Norma Walton Jordan | Rocky Mount, NC 27804 | $1,437 |
12 | Dianne Leigh Sumner | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $1,335 |
13 | Juanita G Mclamb | Clinton, NC 28328 | $1,242 |
14 | Mclamb Family Partnership | Garland, NC 28441 | $1,228 |
15 | Norwood O Hargrove | Knightdale, NC 27545 | $1,119 |
16 | David H Sanderson | Harrells, NC 28444 | $1,118 |
17 | Wayne Osborn Sanderson | Harrells, NC 28444 | $1,118 |
18 | Garvice W Naylor Jr | Concord, NC 28027 | $1,098 |
19 | Peggy Hope | Asheboro, NC 27205 | $1,094 |
20 | Robert C Hope | Asheboro, NC 27205 | $1,094 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>