Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 262
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $9,654,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Morgan Berg | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $27,555 |
82 | Bernard K Stadheim | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $26,730 |
83 | Clifford And Eileen Engraf Family Trust | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $26,497 |
84 | Derek Paul Lee | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $25,217 |
85 | Steven Ron West | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $25,111 |
86 | Brannon R Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $24,797 |
87 | Russell Newhall | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $24,442 |
88 | Gordon Lee Bader | Mott, ND 58646 | $24,216 |
89 | Norma Jean Zimmermann | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $23,728 |
90 | Rebecca Newhall | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $22,806 |
91 | Shannon John Glines | Hettnger, ND 58639 | $22,739 |
92 | Jeremy Michael Sorrels | Reeder, ND 58649 | $22,674 |
93 | Randall William Holden | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $22,672 |
94 | Wayne Francis Seamands | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $21,952 |
95 | Lynn Pagel | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $21,327 |
96 | Mike Shane Dauwen | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $20,071 |
97 | Bill Christman | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $19,766 |
98 | Brooke Sanford | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $18,814 |
99 | Keith Ray Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $18,361 |
100 | Duane Engraf | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $17,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”