Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 262
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $9,654,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eaton Farms | Reeder, ND 58649 | $480,271 |
2 | Thomas N Rusch | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $250,000 |
3 | Timothy John Wegner | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $250,000 |
4 | Jacki Vaughn Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $250,000 |
5 | James Kilzer | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $228,952 |
6 | Jordan Jacob Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $224,234 |
7 | Dan Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $203,723 |
8 | Mitch Bradan Miller | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $198,181 |
9 | Scott Edward Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $183,450 |
10 | Howe Herefords Inc | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $182,383 |
11 | Cole Thomas Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $174,182 |
12 | Beverly Rose Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $167,617 |
13 | Russell Earl Doe | Reeder, ND 58649 | $159,776 |
14 | Billie Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $153,157 |
15 | Nathan Burnell Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $152,022 |
16 | Tyler Kostelecky | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $151,412 |
17 | Michael Ray Mellmer | Reeder, ND 58649 | $148,581 |
18 | Ben O Eaton | Reeder, ND 58649 | $147,191 |
19 | Kalen Edward Manthei | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $143,090 |
20 | Evenson Angus | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $139,449 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>