Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Adams County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 90
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $945,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ryan Ray Honeyman | Reeder, ND 58649 | $57,334 |
2 | Russell Earl Doe | Reeder, ND 58649 | $48,355 |
3 | Howe Herefords Inc | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $37,185 |
4 | Dan Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $36,715 |
5 | Linda Lee Doe | Reeder, ND 58649 | $35,016 |
6 | Ross Alan Engraf | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $34,973 |
7 | Michael Ray Mellmer | Reeder, ND 58649 | $32,672 |
8 | Dustin Michael Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $32,298 |
9 | Mitch Bradan Miller | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $29,656 |
10 | Donna Rae Laufer | Mott, ND 58646 | $27,848 |
11 | Devan Scott Laufer | Mott, ND 58646 | $27,848 |
12 | Timothy John Wegner | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $21,556 |
13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $21,462 |
14 | Tyson Symanowski | Reeder, ND 58649 | $21,148 |
15 | Nathan Howard Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $19,353 |
16 | Rodney Erwin Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $18,748 |
17 | Earl Wayne Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $16,188 |
18 | Shawn Micheal Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $16,147 |
19 | Steven Craig Wegner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $14,691 |
20 | Blake Honeyman | Reeder, ND 58649 | $14,383 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>