Counter Cyclical Program in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 333
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $425,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jonathon Len Eaton | Reeder, ND 58649 | $43,675 |
2 | Ben O Eaton | Reeder, ND 58649 | $25,795 |
3 | Earl Wayne Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $12,095 |
4 | Lauren Chris Zimmermann | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $10,555 |
5 | J & M Farms Ltd | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $9,011 |
6 | Thomas Dean Arndorfer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $8,979 |
7 | Evenson Angus | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $7,895 |
8 | Delroy Dean Siewert | Reeder, ND 58649 | $7,357 |
9 | William Patrick Galbreth | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $7,262 |
10 | Rodney Wayne Lutz | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $6,398 |
11 | Mitchell Ray Daley | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $6,159 |
12 | Jon Harvey Markegard | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $6,024 |
13 | Gregory Lyle Seamands | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $5,514 |
14 | Steven Craig Wegner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $4,946 |
15 | Jeremy Lynn Stadheim | Reeder, ND 58649 | $4,688 |
16 | William David Larson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $4,672 |
17 | Justin Ben Eaton | Reeder, ND 58649 | $4,570 |
18 | Rodney Erwin Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $4,422 |
19 | Danny Duane Engraf | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $4,325 |
20 | Burnell Roger Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $4,318 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>