Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Benson County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 574
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Benson County, North Dakota totaled $22,924,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | First Community Credit Union ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $234,404 |
22 | Arnold Ag Ventures, Inc. | Harvey, ND 58341 | $234,033 |
23 | Paul Andrew Vetsch | Esmond, ND 58332 | $217,394 |
24 | Raphael Frank Keller | Leeds, ND 58346 | $215,035 |
25 | Mark Williams | Maddock, ND 58348 | $210,422 |
26 | Jason Duchscher | York, ND 58386 | $201,074 |
27 | Philip Volk | York, ND 58386 | $195,588 |
28 | Jeff Hagen | Esmond, ND 58332 | $187,197 |
29 | Tamie Bisbee | York, ND 58386 | $183,136 |
30 | Robert Louis Arnold | Minot, ND 58701 | $163,146 |
31 | Bryan Curtis Kenner | Maddock, ND 58348 | $161,662 |
32 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $157,989 |
33 | Ronald Kramer | Rugby, ND 58368 | $154,282 |
34 | Mark Stephen Kallenbach | Maddock, ND 58348 | $154,072 |
35 | Keith Clarence Drake | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $152,900 |
36 | Thomas Howard Schmid | Oberon, ND 58357 | $143,871 |
37 | Kevin Borgen | Wolford, ND 58385 | $140,865 |
38 | James D Arnold | Esmond, ND 58332 | $140,407 |
39 | Mark Ludvig Hoffert | Rugby, ND 58368 | $139,139 |
40 | Steve Biby | Leeds, ND 58346 | $136,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”