Direct Payment Program in Cass County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,623
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Cass County, North Dakota totaled $114,324,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Glasow Farms Partnership | Davenport, ND 58021 | $1,208,578 |
2 | Thompson Family Farm Jtvt | Page, ND 58064 | $1,047,670 |
3 | Future Vision Partnership | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $819,059 |
4 | Dalrymple Farms | Casselton, ND 58012 | $745,041 |
5 | Duane/corinne Dickson Jtvt | Fargo, ND 58104 | $741,665 |
6 | Saewert Brothers Partnership | Davenport, ND 58021 | $631,130 |
7 | Nelson Farm Enterprises Part | Amenia, ND 58004 | $613,252 |
8 | Giermann Partnership | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $584,268 |
9 | Ulmer Farms Part | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $503,721 |
10 | David & Teresa Braaten Farms | Kindred, ND 58051 | $489,920 |
11 | Williams Farms Part | Arthur, ND 58006 | $469,546 |
12 | Ralph/cleo Thompson Jtvt | Page, ND 58064 | $465,005 |
13 | Mark Andrews Farm | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $461,452 |
14 | Grindberg Farms | Fargo, ND 58103 | $456,794 |
15 | John/margaret Rutten Jtvt | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $454,145 |
16 | William Robert Wedberg Jr | Hunter, ND 58048 | $449,831 |
17 | Claude Richard Farms Inc | Fargo, ND 58104 | $448,525 |
18 | Nipstad Farms Inc | Hickson, ND 58047 | $446,185 |
19 | David Gerard Baumler | Amenia, ND 58004 | $443,824 |
20 | Craig Alan Runck | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $439,108 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>