Conservation Reserve Program in Eddy County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 156
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $785,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Noack Family Farms Partnership Lllp | Fargo, ND 58104 | $43,281 |
| 2 | Eugene Oliver Gleason | Tolna, ND 58380 | $39,441 |
| 3 | Gladys Hoyt | Carrington, ND 58421 | $22,085 |
| 4 | Donald E Halverson | Armour, SD 57313 | $21,431 |
| 5 | Knecht Revocable Living Trust | Forest Grove, OR 97116 | $20,004 |
| 6 | Duane Cunningham | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $19,931 |
| 7 | John Brian Gisi | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $17,490 |
| 8 | Kathleen V Thueson | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $16,790 |
| 9 | Larry Walford | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $16,106 |
| 10 | John Lee Loffelmacher | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $16,084 |
| 11 | Bank Forward ** | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $15,774 |
| 12 | Soderholm Farm Acct | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $14,548 |
| 13 | Arlo Omoth | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $13,774 |
| 14 | Kenneth Walford | Warwick, ND 58381 | $13,426 |
| 15 | Spirit Lake Tribe | Fort Totten, ND 58335 | $12,784 |
| 16 | Donna Weber | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $12,678 |
| 17 | Lyle C Dahl | Tolna, ND 58380 | $12,358 |
| 18 | Michelle Beauclair | Weatherford, TX 76086 | $11,992 |
| 19 | Stephen James Beauclair | Davenport, ND 58021 | $11,584 |
| 20 | Mchenry Family Farm Llp | Casselton, ND 58012 | $11,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf