Total Commodity Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 161
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $158,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Allan Joseph Kohl | New England, ND 58647 | $14,956 |
2 | Bobby Lee Kubas | Belfield, ND 58622 | $9,730 |
3 | Merlyn J Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $6,899 |
4 | Scott M Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $6,002 |
5 | Matt Quentin Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $6,002 |
6 | Rickie Hintz | Bentley, ND 58562 | $5,891 |
7 | Dakota West Farms | New England, ND 58647 | $4,242 |
8 | Jeremy Lynn Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $3,576 |
9 | Marc P Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $2,925 |
10 | Carter Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $2,913 |
11 | Bailie Jean Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $2,913 |
12 | Nathan Burnell Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,741 |
13 | Leslie Paul Gion | Regent, ND 58650 | $2,713 |
14 | Milton Mark Klein | Elgin, ND 58533 | $2,664 |
15 | Christopher Binstock | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $2,616 |
16 | Archie R Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $2,521 |
17 | Anthony Binstock | Regent, ND 58650 | $2,367 |
18 | Dean Duane Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,328 |
19 | Dawn Annette Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,327 |
20 | Rodney Erwin Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $2,286 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>