Farm Subsidy information
Hettinger County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 555
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $21,623,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marlin Schneider | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $32,230 |
22 | Dawn Annette Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $31,809 |
23 | , | $30,639 | |
24 | Monty Dee Larson | Mott, ND 58646 | $30,353 |
25 | Blickensderfer Farms | Mott, ND 58646 | $29,720 |
26 | Jacqueline Larson | Mott, ND 58646 | $28,598 |
27 | Donna Rae Laufer | Mott, ND 58646 | $28,395 |
28 | Archie R Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $28,096 |
29 | , | $27,514 | |
30 | Sherry A Ebert | Mott, ND 58646 | $26,980 |
31 | Gt Stock And Grain | Mott, ND 58646 | $26,646 |
32 | Devan Scott Laufer | Mott, ND 58646 | $25,389 |
33 | Jeffery E Maples | Belle, MO 65013 | $25,293 |
34 | Gary Leroy Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $25,199 |
35 | Bradley John Steiner | Mott, ND 58646 | $24,613 |
36 | Tamra Ann Koppinger | Mott, ND 58646 | $24,594 |
37 | Aaron Joseph Krauter | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $24,040 |
38 | Clarence L Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $23,224 |
39 | Tracey Jean Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $23,099 |
40 | Bonnie J Bieber | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $22,756 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”