Total Commodity Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 161
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $158,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeffrey F Greff | Regent, ND 58650 | $2,091 |
22 | Kelly Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $2,069 |
23 | Beau Daniel Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $1,994 |
24 | William Tanner Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $1,994 |
25 | Brent Howard Roth | Bison, SD 57620 | $1,899 |
26 | Kerry Dale Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,812 |
27 | Daniel Jay Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $1,779 |
28 | , | $1,564 | |
29 | Teresa Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $1,562 |
30 | Stuart Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $1,562 |
31 | Brent Martin Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,403 |
32 | Mary Joanne Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,402 |
33 | Nathan John Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,401 |
34 | Shane & Stacey Hertz-jv | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,346 |
35 | Lance Michael Olson | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,313 |
36 | Patrick Aaron Kilzer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $1,282 |
37 | James Dale Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,264 |
38 | Tracey Jean Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,264 |
39 | Nathan Charles Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,243 |
40 | James G Thomas | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,234 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”