Total Commodity Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 161
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $158,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Charles J Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,153 |
42 | Tina M Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,153 |
43 | Perry August Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,121 |
44 | Starla Deann Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,121 |
45 | Warren Gilbert Doe | New England, ND 58647 | $1,086 |
46 | Shane L Stecher | New England, ND 58647 | $1,070 |
47 | Eugene E Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $1,047 |
48 | Joshua James Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,039 |
49 | Lee Kathrein | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $987 |
50 | Justin Nelson | New England, ND 58647 | $969 |
51 | Cade M Blickensderfer | Mott, ND 58646 | $886 |
52 | Joseph John Kohl Jr | New England, ND 58647 | $815 |
53 | James Alan Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $764 |
54 | Jonathan Chris Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $761 |
55 | Sheri Ann Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $761 |
56 | Raymond F Kilzer | Mott, ND 58646 | $758 |
57 | Vicki Janell Kilzer | Mott, ND 58646 | $758 |
58 | Daxon A Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $659 |
59 | Alvin Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $643 |
60 | Messer Beaver Creek Ranch Gp | Richardton, ND 58652 | $628 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”