Farm Subsidy information
Hettinger County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 658
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $43,509,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Leonard Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $134,017 |
62 | Darwyn F Mayer | Mott, ND 58646 | $132,916 |
63 | Richard Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $128,650 |
64 | Robert Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $128,650 |
65 | Shannon Ray Rafferty | Regent, ND 58650 | $126,454 |
66 | Lance Michael Olson | Mott, ND 58646 | $126,313 |
67 | Beverly Kay Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $123,429 |
68 | Carter Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $123,413 |
69 | Bailie Jean Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $123,413 |
70 | Ronnie Lee Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $123,339 |
71 | Roger T Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $122,403 |
72 | Christopher Carl Carlson | Mott, ND 58646 | $121,715 |
73 | Levi Nickolas Krebs | New England, ND 58647 | $120,566 |
74 | Gary F Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $119,021 |
75 | Dylan Joseph Witte | Regent, ND 58650 | $118,897 |
76 | Alex Jirges | New England, ND 58647 | $117,214 |
77 | Leon Joseph Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $115,641 |
78 | James Alan Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $114,932 |
79 | Raymond Nick Greff | Mott, ND 58646 | $114,751 |
80 | John Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $112,106 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”