Total Commodity Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 486
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $16,471,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Leonard Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $71,722 |
82 | Delinda Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $71,721 |
83 | Jimmy Lee Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $71,160 |
84 | Brandon Dean Jalbert | Reeder, ND 58649 | $70,669 |
85 | Constance Joy Jalbert | Reeder, ND 58649 | $70,669 |
86 | Alex Jirges | New England, ND 58647 | $70,113 |
87 | Douglas R Keller | New England, ND 58647 | $69,544 |
88 | Dawn Annette Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $69,164 |
89 | Dean Duane Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $69,164 |
90 | Christopher Carl Carlson | Mott, ND 58646 | $68,464 |
91 | Weston Tyler Bohnet | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $67,881 |
92 | James Scott Pahlmeyer | Regent, ND 58650 | $66,699 |
93 | Dennis John Wegh | Regent, ND 58650 | $65,940 |
94 | Rickie Hintz | Bentley, ND 58562 | $65,742 |
95 | John Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $64,137 |
96 | Bert Andrew Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $63,469 |
97 | Curtis L Wax And Michele D Wax Revocable Living Tr | Regent, ND 58650 | $63,059 |
98 | Richard Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $62,658 |
99 | Robert Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $62,658 |
100 | Lee Grosz | Mott, ND 58646 | $62,547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”