Farm Subsidy information
Hettinger County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 658
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $43,509,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Reid Sorenson | New England, ND 58647 | $86,409 |
102 | Jessica Sorenson | New England, ND 58647 | $86,409 |
103 | Daniel Jay Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $85,785 |
104 | Brady A Wegh | Mott, ND 58646 | $85,676 |
105 | John Patrick Kathrein | New England, ND 58647 | $85,485 |
106 | Donald Gary Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $84,734 |
107 | Anthony Binstock | Regent, ND 58650 | $84,536 |
108 | Carmen Connie Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $83,099 |
109 | Keith Witte | Regent, ND 58650 | $80,351 |
110 | Shannay A Witte | Regent, ND 58650 | $80,199 |
111 | Devin Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $80,068 |
112 | Randy Oscar Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $78,429 |
113 | Tommie Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $78,429 |
114 | Derrick J Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $78,170 |
115 | Shane L Stecher | New England, ND 58647 | $77,089 |
116 | Merlyn J Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $76,903 |
117 | Russell L Schauer | Regent, ND 58650 | $75,974 |
118 | Jennifer Jo Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $75,491 |
119 | Brad Donald Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $75,195 |
120 | Tamra Ann Koppinger | Mott, ND 58646 | $73,648 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”