Total Commodity Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 486
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $16,471,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Joe Christopher Schorsch | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $48,791 |
122 | Raymond Nick Greff | Mott, ND 58646 | $47,259 |
123 | Alton Ray Lien | Regent, ND 58650 | $47,134 |
124 | Archie R Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $46,969 |
125 | Levi Nickolas Krebs | New England, ND 58647 | $46,383 |
126 | Kent Lowell Maershbecker | New England, ND 58647 | $45,347 |
127 | Logan Wyatt Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $45,074 |
128 | Donald Gary Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $44,310 |
129 | Carmen Connie Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $44,310 |
130 | Jeremy Jay Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $43,900 |
131 | Mark David Anderson | Regent, ND 58650 | $43,620 |
132 | Jill Suzanne Anderson | Regent, ND 58650 | $43,619 |
133 | Diane Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $42,571 |
134 | Dylan Joseph Witte | Regent, ND 58650 | $41,751 |
135 | Gary F Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $41,384 |
136 | Nathan Thomas | Mott, ND 58646 | $41,206 |
137 | Gregg Dion Urlacher | Regent, ND 58650 | $40,460 |
138 | Jarin Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $40,233 |
139 | Patrick Aaron Kilzer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $40,077 |
140 | Gary Schaefer | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $40,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”