Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 244
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $83,544 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leon Louis Monke | Regent, ND 58650 | $10,392 |
| 2 | Jerald N Rafferty | New England, ND 58647 | $9,911 |
| 3 | Darrell Dean Jalbert | Reeder, ND 58649 | $5,000 |
| 4 | Richard Albert Lutz | Regent, ND 58650 | $4,298 |
| 5 | Jonathan & Robin Stang-jv | Regent, ND 58650 | $4,251 |
| 6 | Leonard Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $3,925 |
| 7 | Aaron Joseph Krauter | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $3,697 |
| 8 | Scott Allen Monke | New England, ND 58647 | $3,468 |
| 9 | Peter M Miller Est | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,940 |
| 10 | Larry & Ruth Stang-jv | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $2,858 |
| 11 | James G Thomas | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,271 |
| 12 | Douglas Lee Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $2,179 |
| 13 | Janelle Susan Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $2,154 |
| 14 | Richard & Connie Lutz-jv | Regent, ND 58650 | $2,143 |
| 15 | Todd Lutz | New England, ND 58647 | $2,122 |
| 16 | Jon Lutz | New England, ND 58647 | $2,121 |
| 17 | Dale William Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,895 |
| 18 | Dorothy A Kohl | New England, ND 58647 | $1,460 |
| 19 | Mark Allen Koller | New England, ND 58647 | $1,380 |
| 20 | Raymond Nick Greff | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,349 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf