Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 319
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $9,521,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jonathan & Robin Stang-jv | Regent, ND 58650 | $259,248 |
2 | Commercial Bank Of Mott ** | Mott, ND 58646 | $200,746 |
3 | Shane & Stacey Hertz-jv | Mott, ND 58646 | $173,653 |
4 | Jonathan Chris Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $150,536 |
5 | Sheri Ann Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $148,670 |
6 | Garret Ray Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $127,205 |
7 | Jennifer Jo Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $127,205 |
8 | Kelly Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $114,501 |
9 | Amy Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $114,501 |
10 | Gary Dean Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $103,104 |
11 | Tia Marie Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $103,104 |
12 | Nathan Charles Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $102,808 |
13 | Douglas Lee Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $101,675 |
14 | Janelle Susan Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $101,675 |
15 | Blickensderfer Farms | Mott, ND 58646 | $99,403 |
16 | Scott Allen Monke | New England, ND 58647 | $96,579 |
17 | Nathan John Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $94,877 |
18 | Brent Martin Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $90,887 |
19 | Dion Dale Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $88,843 |
20 | Daxon A Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $86,443 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>