Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 131
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $585,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Anthony Krebs | New England, ND 58647 | $42,608 |
| 2 | Robert Lee Martin | Mott, ND 58646 | $33,303 |
| 3 | Eric Alvin Kibbel | Mott, ND 58646 | $28,938 |
| 4 | Gregg Dion Urlacher | Regent, ND 58650 | $26,383 |
| 5 | Del Lynn Eisenbarth | New England, ND 58647 | $25,987 |
| 6 | Lon Dell Eisenbarth | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $25,640 |
| 7 | Darrell Kilzer | Mandan, ND 58554 | $21,546 |
| 8 | Raymond Nick Greff | Mott, ND 58646 | $20,455 |
| 9 | Kent Lowell Maershbecker | New England, ND 58647 | $16,285 |
| 10 | Marc P Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $15,823 |
| 11 | Archie R Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $15,288 |
| 12 | Peter Ebner | Mott, ND 58646 | $13,793 |
| 13 | George Edward Nadvornik | Mott, ND 58646 | $11,897 |
| 14 | Morell James Hirning | Mott, ND 58646 | $11,357 |
| 15 | Roger Simon Jahner | Mott, ND 58646 | $10,901 |
| 16 | David Hoherz | Bentley, ND 58562 | $9,741 |
| 17 | Albert Alvin Frey | Mott, ND 58646 | $9,293 |
| 18 | Kasper Binstock | Regent, ND 58650 | $8,586 |
| 19 | Verlin J Pekas | Mott, ND 58646 | $8,532 |
| 20 | Valentine Jahner | Mott, ND 58646 | $7,290 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf