Crop Disaster Assistance Program in McLean County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,438
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in McLean County, North Dakota totaled $25,167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lynn Billadeau Farms | Parshall, ND 58770 | $326,364 |
2 | Lynn D Billadeau | Parshall, ND 58770 | $251,206 |
3 | Fredrick William Fischer | Mercer, ND 58559 | $213,775 |
4 | Robert Landgren | Wilton, ND 58579 | $195,695 |
5 | Harvey Allen Billadeau | Parshall, ND 58770 | $193,077 |
6 | Stacey Earl Roberts | Raub, ND 58779 | $192,378 |
7 | Anchor Farms Inc | Parshall, ND 58770 | $188,449 |
8 | Roger A Ketterling | Mercer, ND 58559 | $182,565 |
9 | Wade Billadeau Farms Inc | Raub, ND 58779 | $176,541 |
10 | Wade Dean Billadeau | Raub, ND 58779 | $168,035 |
11 | Terry Lane Kolden | Roseglen, ND 58775 | $164,055 |
12 | Kenneth Leroy Rustad | Roseglen, ND 58775 | $163,980 |
13 | Louis Charles Simenson | Garrison, ND 58540 | $159,919 |
14 | Monte S Carvell | Washburn, ND 58577 | $159,232 |
15 | Kelley D Sayler | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $152,494 |
16 | Thomas Volochenko | Butte, ND 58723 | $152,278 |
17 | Fred L Olson | Max, ND 58759 | $147,061 |
18 | Garrett Dean Gilbertson | Parshall, ND 58770 | $146,137 |
19 | Clinton Orville Tweeten | Washburn, ND 58577 | $143,743 |
20 | Gerald Carl Yahnke | Ryder, ND 58779 | $140,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>