Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 780
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $19,984,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kenneth A Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $263,746 |
| 2 | Mary Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $230,316 |
| 3 | Dale Craig Heinle | Hebron, ND 58638 | $210,240 |
| 4 | Dennis Jerome Renner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $205,057 |
| 5 | Larry Laubner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $200,978 |
| 6 | Orval Paul Schlenvogt | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $186,475 |
| 7 | Steckler Ranch Inc | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $171,243 |
| 8 | Leslie Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $169,089 |
| 9 | Glenn Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $165,003 |
| 10 | Lance Eugene Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $159,373 |
| 11 | Annette Helen Heinert | Solen, ND 58570 | $157,329 |
| 12 | August Joseph Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $147,443 |
| 13 | Dale Allen Neidhardt | New Salem, ND 58563 | $147,068 |
| 14 | Mike J Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $146,027 |
| 15 | John J Hatzenbuhler | Mandan, ND 58554 | $144,693 |
| 16 | Terrance James Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $130,569 |
| 17 | Craig Michael Horst | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $126,869 |
| 18 | Marshall Feland | Mandan, ND 58554 | $125,060 |
| 19 | Gordon Raymond Knoll | Mandan, ND 58554 | $123,930 |
| 20 | Mitchel P Kinnischtzke | Hebron, ND 58638 | $122,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf