Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Morton County, North Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 146
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $510,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Todd Hoff | Flasher, ND 58535 | $24,928 |
2 | Dakota Community Bank & Trust ** | Hebron, ND 58638 | $24,093 |
3 | Starion Financial ** | Mandan, ND 58554 | $23,301 |
4 | Dennis Carlson | Mandan, ND 58554 | $18,491 |
5 | Rabo Agrifinance LLC ** | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $16,649 |
6 | Douglas Hille | Mandan, ND 58554 | $15,772 |
7 | Bank Of Glen Ullin ** | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $15,462 |
8 | Ajr Farms Llp | Flasher, ND 58535 | $13,558 |
9 | James Edward Thiel | Almont, ND 58520 | $11,549 |
10 | Bruce Blend | New Salem, ND 58563 | $11,050 |
11 | Blaine Hopfauf | Mandan, ND 58554 | $10,971 |
12 | Jared Lane Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $10,094 |
13 | Roger Gail Hoovestol | Mandan, ND 58554 | $9,314 |
14 | Kenneth Joseph Miller | Fort Rice, ND 58554 | $9,252 |
15 | Charles Douglas Kaelberer | New Salem, ND 58563 | $9,232 |
16 | Darrell Jacob Kuhn | New Salem, ND 58563 | $9,000 |
17 | Amy Lynn Heinle | Hebron, ND 58638 | $8,742 |
18 | Reed Kaelberer | New Salem, ND 58563 | $8,741 |
19 | Dennis Kunkel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $8,728 |
20 | Russell Kunkel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $8,728 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>