Conservation Reserve Program in Ransom County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 330
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $3,407,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dana Huether Farm Ptr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $76,380 |
| 2 | Tk Huether Farms | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $50,812 |
| 3 | Bruce Pantzke | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $50,000 |
| 4 | Sharie Wagner | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $49,611 |
| 5 | Duane Cole | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $48,998 |
| 6 | Meyer Family Lllp | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $48,861 |
| 7 | Gkl Farms Llp | Fargo, ND 58102 | $48,534 |
| 8 | Gaylen James Dick | Englevale, ND 58033 | $48,216 |
| 9 | Daryl Keith Strander | Englevale, ND 58033 | $46,291 |
| 10 | Brayden Chad Wagner | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $46,041 |
| 11 | Mary Beth Wagner | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $46,041 |
| 12 | Mairs Family Trust | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $45,807 |
| 13 | Lyle Jerome Olson | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $45,640 |
| 14 | Benjamin Peter Dick | Englevale, ND 58033 | $43,471 |
| 15 | Bremer Bank ** | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $41,465 |
| 16 | Chad Ronald Wagner | Englevale, ND 58033 | $40,947 |
| 17 | James Dick | Englevale, ND 58033 | $40,323 |
| 18 | Allen Mcdaniel | Gwinner, ND 58040 | $40,265 |
| 19 | Candace M Meyer | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $39,581 |
| 20 | Bs Farms | Englevale, ND 58033 | $39,350 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf