Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Sargent County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 128
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Sargent County, North Dakota totaled $528,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gulleson Farm And Ranch Llp | Rutland, ND 58067 | $46,947 |
2 | Michael John Hayen Jr | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $43,833 |
3 | Three M Farms Partnership | Hecla, SD 57446 | $25,334 |
4 | Garrett Lee Hayen | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $20,531 |
5 | Gulleson Bros | Rutland, ND 58067 | $19,613 |
6 | Gibbon Farm & Ranch Inc | Milnor, ND 58060 | $15,648 |
7 | Jarret Joseph Schroeder | Oakes, ND 58474 | $15,179 |
8 | Phillip Henry Freeman | Geneseo, ND 58053 | $14,350 |
9 | Kevin John Throener | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $10,962 |
10 | Thomas Edward Geffre | Crete, ND 58040 | $10,490 |
11 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $10,194 |
12 | Boyd P Brummond | Havana, ND 58043 | $9,496 |
13 | Quandt Brothers | Oakes, ND 58474 | $8,865 |
14 | Jeffrey Dean Breker | Havana, ND 58043 | $8,841 |
15 | John J Schroeder | Oakes, ND 58474 | $8,168 |
16 | David Hassebroek | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $8,009 |
17 | Jordan Thomas Geffre | Oakes, ND 58474 | $7,337 |
18 | Ronda Throener | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $7,180 |
19 | Richard Harold Ruch | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $7,176 |
20 | Stroehl Cattle Company | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $7,082 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>